Within the last few years, the global phenomenon of YouTube has, in turn, given birth to yet another global phenomenon, commonly referred to as the “Viral Video.”
As these videos are quickly (and often inadvertently) able to draw hundreds of millions of viewers to a single YouTube page, it is very easy to see the enormous advertising potential. In a somewhat unnatural trend, large companies and corporations have begun attempts to create their own Viral Marketing Campaigns.
The surprise successes of spontaneous viral videos such as Tay Zonday’s Chocolate Rain (71 million views) http://bit.ly/4tzBuh, Judsy Laipply’s The Evolution of Dance (180 million views) http://bit.ly/p6gAoz, or Charlie Bit My Finger (375 million views) http://bit.ly/cehLPW have generated overnight celebrities from otherwise regular people who just happened to be caught on film. As a result of their viral popularity, many are invited as guests on world famous talk shows, gaining instant worldwide face and name recognition.
The power of a single viral video has proven its ability to reach a global audience, and it has not taken long for companies to begin frothing at the mouth for their own piece of the viral pie. Soon companies (some more successful than others) began to try and create their own viral videos. In some cases, these efforts increased sales substantially. While examples of some of the more successful companies include the Old Spice Man http://bit.ly/aMkmHc, as well as the Evian Roller Babies, http://bit.ly/Z9m3n, as well as the “Will It Blend?” Videos by Blendtec http://bit.ly/3nFqfp, most others have not been so successful.
But when is a company trying ‘too hard’ to create a viral video? Part of the appeal of these viral clips is the unrehearsed, unintentional, spontaneous moments that either happen to be caught on film, or contain so much humor and entertainment value that viewers feel the need to share.
As a result, many of these “Forced Viral Video” campaigns have failed, for example Sony’s “All I Want for Christmas is a PSP” video, which backfired and left a bad taste in the mouths of viewers: http://bit.ly/PT750. GM attempted to cultivate a Viral Marketing Campaign in which they challenged buyers to create their own advertisements. Too bad they were completely unprepared for the environmentalists who began to submit negative ads! http://cnet.co/12zUyP.
While I realize companies will attempt to purposefully create more and more “Viral Videos” in the future (in fact this marketing survey shows the statistics here: http://bit.ly/20iHxX), companies need to understand that these types of videos rarely are successful if the public perceives the marketing as “Forced.” The campaign could even backfire on the company when consumers sense a lack of honesty or genuineness to the viral ads. Even if the goal is to make money, some of the most successful company-led viral campaigns have also shown a genuine interest in entertaining the consumer, or reaching the customer on a personal level, for example the Old Spice Man responding to user comments through his YouTube channel: http://bit.ly/aMkmHc.
Orchestrating the creation of a Viral Video can have high payoffs, but can also be risky to a brand. As is the case with most high-risk investments, the payoff can also be high. Companies just need to make sure they are not trying so hard that they lose touch of the core reasons a video becomes viral – viewers want to be entertained, and they want videos they can share with friends and family. A message to companies out there: before jumping on the Viral Bandwagon, make sure you're being genuine with your customers, because they are smart enough to realize when you aren't.
I concur that viral videos better help brands (or hurt in some cases) when they are original and not driven by the company. It's suprising to see some of the helpful one's, but I remember the "United, you broke my guitar" video on youtube and I still think of that any time the cheapest ticket on Expedia is United. One example of a great company produced viral video is Google's Love or Paris video. I think this is one of the few instances where a company got it right.
ReplyDeleteBridget Wilson
Completely agree with both of you. I think this is further confirmation that as a company, you just need to make great ads that speak for themselves and then let them go viral naturally. Consumers are smart, they can tell if it's forced.
ReplyDeleteThink of great ads like the Volkswagen Darth Vader advertisement. People emailed that to each other, posted it on Facebook, etc because they found it entertaining, funny, and clever. It doesn’t seem forced. Just like the video of the old couple that didn’t realize their webcam was on, people will fanatically forward an ad/video if it’s worthy, not because a company strategy document said that they wanted it to go viral.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R55e-uHQna0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FcN08Tg3PWw
Christina
That is a great assessment, Eric. The beauty of a viral video is that it feels amateurish in some sense, or makes the viewer feel as if they are getting an insider’s view (i.e., a fly on the wall perspective). What some marketers fail to realize is that the public is smart enough to see through pretention. For me, if an ad/video/artistic representation feels inauthentic, I am automatically turned off, which can have long-term effects on my view of a given product or brand. As you said, if the company “tries too hard” then their efforts are completely in vain, and the success of their advertising will, more than likely, suffer or be greatly diminished. Likewise, should an organization produce an ad with the sole intent of capitalizing on the “viral” phenomenon, they risk playing up shenanigans, gimmicky-effects, and trivial plot lines for the sake of uncertain popularity among a fickle public. Gone is the attention paid to proper advertising elements such as clarity, synchronization, and single-mindedness, all of which are traded in for elusive mass views and temporary celebrity. Any sort of creative depiction should be founded in truth and allowed to take on a life of its own, free from corporate interference and pseudo-strategy.
ReplyDeleteD.J. Vaughn